<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Digital Era II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog</link>
	<description>Sofia&#039;s Rendition Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quit your tantrums and just hire the one that&#8217;s better than you by agou</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2010/08/hire-someone-better-than-you/comment-page-1/#comment-4265</link>
		<dc:creator>agou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=302#comment-4265</guid>
		<description>If you can&#039;t beat them, join &#039;em!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can&#8217;t beat them, join &#8216;em!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am the sum of all the people by Takis</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2011/01/i-am-the-sum-of-all-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3268</link>
		<dc:creator>Takis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=327#comment-3268</guid>
		<description>Works the other way too!
You became one of the people that I&#039;ve never met, I never will, but I learned something from you today!
Your idea is now one among the others of all the people in my thoughts.
Why not we just share all our ideas and build a better world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works the other way too!<br />
You became one of the people that I&#8217;ve never met, I never will, but I learned something from you today!<br />
Your idea is now one among the others of all the people in my thoughts.<br />
Why not we just share all our ideas and build a better world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am the sum of all the people by Poetic Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2011/01/i-am-the-sum-of-all-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator>Poetic Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 05:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=327#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>Well, if it&#039;s about the layman&#039;s 9 to 5 work, the question becomes rather moot. In that case, one can argue that, yes, a rather mundane task is enriched from the vast reservoir of available information, so, we definitely have a winner here.

But, is the wisdom of the crowds in and of itself enough to grant posterity to great works of struggling creators? How can I, a common infovore, along with thousands of others can really appreciate and grasp potential greatness just because it happens to catch my attention in the flowing stream? Is exposure helping that much in propelling potential wonder-works up through many layers of background noise and into the spotlights of peer reviewers, now, easier than ever?

Oh, much food for thought you&#039;ve given us there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if it&#8217;s about the layman&#8217;s 9 to 5 work, the question becomes rather moot. In that case, one can argue that, yes, a rather mundane task is enriched from the vast reservoir of available information, so, we definitely have a winner here.</p>
<p>But, is the wisdom of the crowds in and of itself enough to grant posterity to great works of struggling creators? How can I, a common infovore, along with thousands of others can really appreciate and grasp potential greatness just because it happens to catch my attention in the flowing stream? Is exposure helping that much in propelling potential wonder-works up through many layers of background noise and into the spotlights of peer reviewers, now, easier than ever?</p>
<p>Oh, much food for thought you&#8217;ve given us there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am the sum of all the people by Sofia</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2011/01/i-am-the-sum-of-all-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3042</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=327#comment-3042</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; But do they really constitute a rich environment for more creation and good work, or an endless tumult that hampers great inspiration and muddles paths of glory? I wonder.

The question of our age I suspect. 

Rather than academic or artistic greatness I think I was thinking of just plain work, your 9 to 5 sort of speak. Having said that I don&#039;t think that greatness was ever such as everyday occurrence in the pre-internet age. Most of us can aspire to a &#039;job well done&#039;, some of us to brilliant moments and only a minuscule proportion to real greatness. 

Why not think about it a different way? The onslaught of information and works from &#039;real people&#039; rather than Authors or Artists (I guess in the Barthes&#039; sense of the term) might help encourage struggling creators to get their work out there and eventually achieve greatness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> But do they really constitute a rich environment for more creation and good work, or an endless tumult that hampers great inspiration and muddles paths of glory? I wonder.</p>
<p>The question of our age I suspect. </p>
<p>Rather than academic or artistic greatness I think I was thinking of just plain work, your 9 to 5 sort of speak. Having said that I don&#8217;t think that greatness was ever such as everyday occurrence in the pre-internet age. Most of us can aspire to a &#8216;job well done&#8217;, some of us to brilliant moments and only a minuscule proportion to real greatness. </p>
<p>Why not think about it a different way? The onslaught of information and works from &#8216;real people&#8217; rather than Authors or Artists (I guess in the Barthes&#8217; sense of the term) might help encourage struggling creators to get their work out there and eventually achieve greatness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am the sum of all the people by Poetic Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2011/01/i-am-the-sum-of-all-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3041</link>
		<dc:creator>Poetic Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=327#comment-3041</guid>
		<description>Inspiration comes in all shapes and sizes and, truly, can be attributed somewhat to the onslaught of information in the internet era. Hence, &quot;I am the sum of all the people&quot;. But, have we become more creative qualitatively because of this? Are works of prominence, awe-inspiring and historically &quot;concrete&quot; really being made with the help of the deluge of information nowadays? I seriously doubt so.

I&#039;d love to concede the veracity of this feeling, especially since I also navigate my electronic craft through mindscapes a pre-internet era would deem unfathomable, and derive as much pleasure and inspiration as the next person. I also have to admit that magnum opuses of art/science/literature/music/crafts were neither hindered by the absence of the information age, nor diminished in quantity, quality and endurance in time. To which, some might say, give it another thousand years and see how it goes. Absolutely!

All the people you&#039;ve never met and, presumably, never will, project information gathered at the gates of your perception, go through various stages of filtering and influence your work in a myriad of ways.

But do they really constitute a rich environment for more creation and good work, or an endless tumult that hampers great inspiration and muddles paths of glory? I wonder.

I&#039;m glad though you emphasize on people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspiration comes in all shapes and sizes and, truly, can be attributed somewhat to the onslaught of information in the internet era. Hence, &#8220;I am the sum of all the people&#8221;. But, have we become more creative qualitatively because of this? Are works of prominence, awe-inspiring and historically &#8220;concrete&#8221; really being made with the help of the deluge of information nowadays? I seriously doubt so.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to concede the veracity of this feeling, especially since I also navigate my electronic craft through mindscapes a pre-internet era would deem unfathomable, and derive as much pleasure and inspiration as the next person. I also have to admit that magnum opuses of art/science/literature/music/crafts were neither hindered by the absence of the information age, nor diminished in quantity, quality and endurance in time. To which, some might say, give it another thousand years and see how it goes. Absolutely!</p>
<p>All the people you&#8217;ve never met and, presumably, never will, project information gathered at the gates of your perception, go through various stages of filtering and influence your work in a myriad of ways.</p>
<p>But do they really constitute a rich environment for more creation and good work, or an endless tumult that hampers great inspiration and muddles paths of glory? I wonder.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad though you emphasize on people&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I am the sum of all the people by Tweets that mention I am the sum of all the people « Digital Era II -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2011/01/i-am-the-sum-of-all-the-people/comment-page-1/#comment-3039</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention I am the sum of all the people « Digital Era II -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=327#comment-3039</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sofia Gkiousou and Κοnstantina Zoehrer, DESPINA BAKALI. DESPINA BAKALI said: RT @sofiagk: I am the sum of all the people http://ff.im/-wFO9i [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sofia Gkiousou and Κοnstantina Zoehrer, DESPINA BAKALI. DESPINA BAKALI said: RT @sofiagk: I am the sum of all the people <a href="http://ff.im/-wFO9i" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-wFO9i</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One more reason to love moo. Great customer service by dealsend</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2010/11/one-more-reason-to-love-moo-great-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>dealsend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=315#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I love moo cards as well. I love the service and the web paltform.

I hate pricing though.

Moo, provides an excellent platform for DIY cards, and incorporate 3rd party services that they level up the whole designing process.

However, the pricing tag, is really high. For example, 50 moo business cards cost -deliverd to Greece- 19euros.

That is 380euro for 1000 business cards. I can print 1000 for 50euros.

About paper quality, I will agree that they use heavier paper -and they have initiate that recycled paper as well- but even in that case, they are high priced.

To make a long theory short, if you are in a proffesional need of printing, moo is not a printing solution, if you just want limited quantity,creative, looking good DIY material, is the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love moo cards as well. I love the service and the web paltform.</p>
<p>I hate pricing though.</p>
<p>Moo, provides an excellent platform for DIY cards, and incorporate 3rd party services that they level up the whole designing process.</p>
<p>However, the pricing tag, is really high. For example, 50 moo business cards cost -deliverd to Greece- 19euros.</p>
<p>That is 380euro for 1000 business cards. I can print 1000 for 50euros.</p>
<p>About paper quality, I will agree that they use heavier paper -and they have initiate that recycled paper as well- but even in that case, they are high priced.</p>
<p>To make a long theory short, if you are in a proffesional need of printing, moo is not a printing solution, if you just want limited quantity,creative, looking good DIY material, is the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One more reason to love moo. Great customer service by Apotheosis</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2010/11/one-more-reason-to-love-moo-great-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Apotheosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=315#comment-381</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the recommendation, I need some business cards printed and I was looking around to find a good provider (I like my stuff kinda &#039;individual&#039; and &#039;different&#039;, for better or worse), so I&#039;ll give them a go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the recommendation, I need some business cards printed and I was looking around to find a good provider (I like my stuff kinda &#8216;individual&#8217; and &#8216;different&#8217;, for better or worse), so I&#8217;ll give them a go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diversification in start ups. When is a good time to take the next step? by Sofia</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2010/10/diversification-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=306#comment-338</guid>
		<description>orestisf&gt;&gt; true. but WHEN? - which I guess in this context is the million dollar question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>orestisf>> true. but WHEN? &#8211; which I guess in this context is the million dollar question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Diversification in start ups. When is a good time to take the next step? by orestisf</title>
		<link>http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/index.php/2010/10/diversification-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>orestisf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digital-era.org/renditionblog/?p=306#comment-337</guid>
		<description>In the case of Moo, they could begin expansion with a product like a photobook, which sits in a way between the cards and text-books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of Moo, they could begin expansion with a product like a photobook, which sits in a way between the cards and text-books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

